Skip to main content

Interference: a notation for silent singing

These drawings are notations for silent singing.

Any music notation is a space of time, a reckoning of past, present, and future, with the performance as its sum. The score is a tally-sheet, with the performance as its sum. It is a calculus of the body.

By rendering breathlessness in fields of pitched consonants, is it possible these drawings give us a positive notation for silence -- for incipient noise as music?

In the end, in their performance as music, they may not actually be scores for a vocalist, but for a dancer, or an actor, as the body in space are the terms of those performance arts, even possibly the closed, private spaces of the mouth and throat.

Anechoic Chamber Orchestra

In my book Drawing Music, Marking Time (Bloomsbury 2025), I argue that music notation functions as a hybrid form: part image, part diagram, and part writing. It is not merely denotative but connotative, forming a complex drawing system that exceeds simple graphic representation. Such drawings operate as a bridge between sound and vision. It enables composers, critics, and educators to produce adaptable, portable, and legible documents that sustain collaboration across time and culture. Crucially, music notations uniquely incorporate time not as an abstract dimension but as an active character within the system—we write with time. A musical manuscript is thus a drawing that proposes pathways through time, structured yet open to interpretation, capable of generating rich auditory experiences.

The “Anechoic Chamber Orchestra” project, extends these ideas toward an inherently unfinishable inquiry: how to develop a graphical method that transforms the body into scoring instrument. All art orbits the body—whether in drawing, voice, rhythm, or movement. The challenge is to translate lived duration into a writable and shareable form. How might we compose the rhythms and pitches of our own temporal existence?

I draw on John Cage’s concept of duration as the essential structural principle of music. Cage argued that sound and silence are inseparable, and that all sound contains pitch, timbre, and loudness, unified by duration. Cage’s 1951 visit to Harvard’s anechoic chamber is instructive. In a space designed for silence, he heard two sounds: his nervous system and his blood circulation. This suggests that even in silence, the body produces continuous sonic activity. The anechoic chamber thus reveals the body as an involuntary composer, marking space-time through its own processes. So, can notation systems translate biological signals into music? Can we score the rhythms of circulation, respiration, or neural activity? Rather than focusing on abstract listening, this project considers whether bodily processes themselves can serve as compositional input. This project proposes an analog approach: to listen closely to bodily rhythms and render them through drawing. Rather than relying on digital tools or “black box” systems such as AI or sonification software, the emphasis is on direct inscription—pencil on paper—as a way of translating sensation into graphical form.

I ask whether bodily systems—circulatory, respiratory, nervous—can be mapped as orchestral parts, forming a total composition of the self. Contemporary practices offer parallels. Markus Buehler’s (MIT) translates molecular vibrations into music; Christine Sun Kim explores sound through social and sensory engagement, while Christian Bök’s Xenotext encodes poetry within living organisms. Each demonstrates how scientific, artistic, and linguistic systems can intersect.

I offer a simpler premise: that the body is already music. Cage’s insight suggests that attention and object are unified; bodily processes are neither noise nor music but both simultaneously. Music, in this sense, is emergent, innate, and continuous. In a notation system based on bodily data, every pulse and breath becomes a performance. Every movement and utterance reflects a dynamic interplay of sensation and intention. Language, gesture, and rhythm all participate in this ongoing composition.

As Wallace Stevens suggests, “music is feeling, not sound.” If so, the ultimate outcome of this project may not be a new notation system but a shift in perception: recognizing the body itself as a living score. We are not metaphorically musical—we are materially and continuously producing music through biological process. Thus, the Anechoic Chamber Orchestra is less a finished system than a conceptual framework. It locates composition within the body’s ongoing activity, an evolutionary process unfolding over vast timescales yet experienced moment by moment. Breathing, circulation, and motion become elements in a continuous performance.

In this sense, composition requires no external apparatus. The system is already embedded within us—an intrinsic, generative structure linking physiology, perception, and expression. The task, then, is not to invent music, but to attend to it: to draw, hear, and understand the rhythms we already are.

A music notation is a kind of tally-sheet; they are documents of events and processes, describing a future of performance. They are true “space-time” drawings, with the value-added capability of play-back.

These are notations based on Isometric drawing -- a graphic method for organizing  objects in space.

See Soundcloud playlist of music derived from these drawings, at "Isometric Projections."